Annotated by moppa (1200): Petrov's Defence is sometimes considered somewhat dull; indeed it's strong drawing weapon in - for example - Kramik's hands. Kotronias vs Rozentalis, 1992(C42) Petrov Defense, 44 moves, 1/2-1/2, 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.O-O O-O 8.c4 c6 9.cxd5 cxd5 10.Nc3 As should any other opening. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3, Kasparov vs Kramnik, 2000 (C42) Petrov Defense, 21 moves, 1/2-1/2, Kasparov vs Karpov, 1985 (C42) Petrov Defense, 67 moves, 1-0, Kasparov vs Karpov, 2002 (C42) Petrov Defense, 47 moves, 0-1, Anand vs Yusupov, 1998(C42) Petrov Defense, 64 moves, 1/2-1/2, Ivanchuk vs Yusupov, 2000 (C42) Petrov Defense, 48 moves, 1-0, Bologan vs Kasimdzhanov, 2002 (C42) Petrov Defense, 41 moves, 1-0, Topalov vs Anand, 2003 (C42) Petrov Defense, 61 moves, 0-1, Ponomariov vs Karpov, 2003 (C42) Petrov Defense, 76 moves, 1-0, Velimirovic vs Schussler, 1979(C42) Petrov Defense, 29 moves, 1-0, Schlechter vs J F Barry, 1904(C42) Petrov Defense, 40 moves, 1/2-1/2, Gelfand vs Adams, 1994 (D20) Queen's Gambit Accepted, 50 moves, 1-0, Shirov vs Gelfand, 2001(C42) Petrov Defense, 37 moves, 1/2-1/2, Topalov vs Anand, 1998(C42) Petrov Defense, 56 moves, 1/2-1/2, Chigorin vs Schiffers, 1879 (C42) Petrov Defense, 25 moves, 1-0, Kupreichik vs Yusupov, 1987 (C42) Petrov Defense, 33 moves, 1-0, V Akopian vs A Ramaswamy, 2007 (C42) Petrov Defense, 25 moves, 1-0, Grischuk vs Pavasovic, 2003(C42) Petrov Defense, 32 moves, 1/2-1/2, V Akopian vs V Gashimov, 2008 (C42) Petrov Defense, 34 moves, 1/2-1/2, Stein vs R Nezhmetdinov, 1972 (C42) Petrov Defense, 43 moves, 1-0, A I Petrushin vs Timoshchenko, 1981 (C42) Petrov Defense, 28 moves, 1-0, H Wagner vs E Kapfer, 1932(C42) Petrov Defense, 29 moves, 1-0, G A Thomas vs A R B Thomas, 1937 (C42) Petrov Defense, 19 moves, 1-0, Kasparov vs Kasimdzhanov, 2005 (C42) Petrov Defense, 51 moves, 1/2-1/2, Kasparov vs Anand, 2005 (C42) Petrov Defense, 22 moves, 1/2-1/2, Leko vs Bacrot, 2006 (C42) Petrov Defense, 41 moves, 1/2-1/2, Areshchenko vs Mamedyarov, 2005 (C42) Petrov Defense, 25 moves, 1-0, Kasparov vs Shirov, 2000 (C42) Petrov Defense, 52 moves, 1-0, Kasparov vs Shirov, 2001 (C42) Petrov Defense, 45 moves, 1-0, Shirov vs Piket, 2001 (C42) Petrov Defense, 43 moves, 1-0, R P Michell vs Milner-Barry, 1934 (C42) Petrov Defense, 30 moves, 1-0, Short vs Harikrishna, 2007(C42) Petrov Defense, 69 moves, 1-0, Vasiukov vs Chekhov, 1975(C42) Petrov Defense, 51 moves, 1-0, Timman vs Van der Wiel, 1984(C42) Petrov Defense, 63 moves, 1-0, Velimirovic vs Murey, 1982(C42) Petrov Defense, 58 moves, 1/2-1/2, Schlechter vs J Mason, 1899 (C42) Petrov Defense, 38 moves, 1-0, Kasparov vs T Dao, 2001(C42) Petrov Defense, 45 moves, 1-0, Fedorowicz vs Smyslov, 1986(C42) Petrov Defense, 31 moves, 1-0, Fischer vs Gheorghiu, 1970 (C42) Petrov Defense, 35 moves, 1-0, Tal vs Smyslov, 1971(C42) Petrov Defense, 20 moves, 1/2-1/2, Psakhis vs Martinovsky, 1989 (C42) Petrov Defense, 25 moves, 1-0, Ponomariov vs Turov, 2001 (C42) Petrov Defense, 61 moves, 1-0, Yagupov vs M Sorokin, 2001(C42) Petrov Defense, 66 moves, 1-0, Timman vs Skembris, 1993(C42) Petrov Defense, 42 moves, 1/2-1/2, Kamsky vs Yusupov, 1992(C42) Petrov Defense, 79 moves, 1-0, Sadvakasov vs K Aliev, 2003(C42) Petrov Defense, 34 moves, 1-0, Kramnik vs Anand, 2003 (C42) Petrov Defense, 51 moves, 1/2-1/2, Kasparov vs Adams, 2002 (C42) Petrov Defense, 47 moves, 1-0, Anand vs Karpov, 1999 (C42) Petrov Defense, 30 moves, 0-1, Anand vs Kramnik, 1999 (C42) Petrov Defense, 27 moves, 1-0, Tal vs G Garcia Gonzalez, 1983 (C42) Petrov Defense, 29 moves, 1-0, Zhong Zhang vs Karpov, 2000(C42) Petrov Defense, 44 moves, 1/2-1/2, 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.O-O O-O 8.c4 c6 9.cxd5 cxd5 10.Nc3 Even if Black does not defend his pawn, White is not forced to take on e5. So, in the last chapter, we have learnt something very important: Black’s only decent third move is 3… d6 ! This is probably not enough for an advantage, but White has some pressure that Black cannot easily neutralize in a few moves. Else this page will give you ideas to fight against it at least ! I’ll capture your pawn on e4 afterwards !”, Black is right, of course, but the way to capture the e4-pawn is not so straightforward…. This defense has the reputation of being very passive, but this is a little relative, it depends on the variation. I was just checking this one out of curiousity as soon as Cochrane was mentioned: The pawns do the work, not the pieces, and if you develop too quickly and exchange a piece or two the opening is dead. This is probably a better attempt for White to get an advantage than the fully symmetrical plan we saw earlier ! This symmetrical play with d2-d3, then d3-d4 is certainly not the most critical line, but it gives White a clear strategic plan, with very few counter play for Black. It's an interesting line of play, especially in the beginning, though it has an awful reputation. In Modern Chess Openings—14 he evaluates the position in Veselin Topalov — Vladimir KramnikLinaresas offering chances for both sides after Pillsbury,0—1 Chessgames. Below is a list of chess openings organized by the Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings (ECO) code. Let’s note also that 5… d6 would lead to the same result than 5… Nc6. But there is something specific I want to show you. We have the Petrov’s Defense on the board after the moves 1. e4 e5 2. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Chess Openings by Example: Petrov Defense at There is a line played at Club level or in Blitz games a lot. In this line, White will castle queenside, Black can choose any side. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3. This move 2… Nf6 is quite provocative in a way. In some cases Black has a threat that is important to understand, even if does not always works. This is one of the critical positions in Petroff Defence these days and it was subject of discussion of many high-level games. The next line we will see is much sharper. The Petrov is for sure a solid defense, but you should not get into autopilot mode when playing it with Black, this is a sure recipe for a disaster ! Plus, after 5.Bc4+ black should reply with the freeing move 5...d5. GM Colovic suggests the rare continuation for White here: 11.Bg5 - the main idea is to start an attack by Qf4-h4. The Bxa2 idea is very important in this whole line of the Petrov. This is a tricky line, in which black attempts to destroy white’s center by attacking the defending knight on f3. In those cases, the Petrov can turn into a wild opening as well ! named after French players who used it in a correspondence match in 1834 White Plays The Main Line Of The Petrov Defense But actually, more often than not, Bxa2 does not work if White plays the right moves. Study the Petrov's Defense: Classical Attack, Jaenisch, Main Line Opening with free tools and analysis. d7-d6 is a solid move, leading to the Philidor defense. Black is giving up a pawn to open up the center for both bishops and queen to freely … The ECO Codes is a classification system for the chess openings moves. Kasparov vs Karpov, 2002 (C42) Petrov Defense, 47 moves, 0-1. Nc3 is still a little too mild and you are probably wondering: “Isn’t there a good gambit against the Petrov, like those countless gambits I can play against the Italian Game or the Scotch Game ?”. Black’s most popular move is to play 5…d5, ensuring that space in the center becomes equal. Bd3, where he will try to drive Black’s advanced knight from e4 with moves like c4 and Re1. - Attack on the b-file. Several lines of the Petroff can lead to an isolated Queen's pawn (IQP) position, if White plays to undermine the Black Knight on e4 with c4, and Black later plays...dxc4. Nxc6 dxc6. Of course, Black did not play the right moves and made several mistakes along the way. Now let’s come back to the position where Black has played the correct Be7, as see what are the main ideas for both sides here. Why did I show you those two lines ? In this seemingly quiet line, the move order matters a lot, especially for Black. This is a long-term gambit in which White has some chances, but Black has several ways to handle it, as we have seen above. C43: Petrov's Defence: Modern Attack, Main line: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 exd4 4.e5 Ne4 5.Qxd4 But again, modify a couple of moves and this sacrifice can work again if Black prepares it a bit better and White is careless ! Kasparov vs Karpov, 1985 (C42) Petrov Defense, 67 moves, 1-0. Now there is a big question: if Black wants to keep the game balanced and equalize easily, the simplest way is to play symmetrically as long as possible. Which is sometimes exactly what you want to play. The Stafford Gambit is an aggressive line for black in the Petrov Defense and begins with the moves: 1. e4 e5 2. This symmetrical play with d2-d3, then d3-d4 is certainly not the most critical line, but it gives White a clear strategic plan, with very few counter play for Black. Qxd4. It can also yield black some initiative on the kingside, so it’s definitely one of the main lines to take into consideration. Hence this article, that will give you some ideas to play this defense with both colors. by a better move, and again the sacrifice does not work for Black ! In general, Black tries to achieve it to equalize, while White is trying to avoid it. Petrov Defense C42 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf6. With that said, there is still room for error on both sides and the Marshall Trap focuses in on a common error that white makes in his development. Even without calculating at all, it is clear that capturing on e5 cannot be bad for White: the position is symmetrical, so either Black finds a way to equalize, or White is better. Petrov, Main Line Compiled by KingG. In this section, we are going to assume that Black continues playing symmetrically with 3… Nxe4. The openings are divided in five volumes labeled from "A" through "E". GM Petrov’s Pirc defense - 1…g6: GM Petrov’s Pirc defense - Main Lines after White’s 4.f4 B09 Pirc: Austrian attack - dragon formation: GM Petrov’s Pirc defense - White plays f4 and e5 B07 Pirc Defense: GM Petrov’s Pirc defense - 4.Bf4 or 4.Bg5 B07 Pirc defense: GM Petrov’s Pirc defense - White plays 4.Be3 B07 Pirc defense For lower-rated players, to whom draws are rarer it should offer chances for both sides though. Nxe4 Qe7.

Wood Stain Remover Nz, Ven Conmigo Translation, Unique Hotels West Coast, California Final Paycheck Deductions, Palm Beach County School District Phone Number, Coastal Living Kitchens, Father John Misty Fear Fun Discogs, Shimano St R7020 105 Shifter Br R7070 Caliper, Batman Action Figures Amazon, Gomukha Vyagra Meaning In Kannada, Savoy Suites, Manesar Wedding, Baby Bop Barney, Yoshihiro Togashi Health,